FWA Letter to Payroll Tax Conferees: Feds Have Sacrificed
Thursday, January 26, 2012(Federal Workers Alliance)
Federal Workers Alliance Chairman William R. Dougan penned a letter today to the members of a Congressional conference committee tasked with passing a bill to extend the payroll tax cut. One of the two bills in conference is ridden with painful cuts to federal pay and benefits and could be devastating for federal workers and their families. In the letter, Dougan asks that conferees stand up for the middle class, and stand with federal employees. The full text of the letter can be read below:
Dear Conferee:
On behalf of the Federal Workers
Alliance (FWA), comprising 22 unions
representing over 300,000 federal employees, we
ask you to reject financing the Social Security
payroll tax extension at the expense of the
federal employees whom we represent. The
House-passed bill, H.R. 3630, funds these
extensions by penalizing federal workers in a
number of ways. The Senate version of this
legislation rejected these harmful
“pay-fors,” and we ask that you reject them
in the conference
committee.
First, we ask that you reject the
extension of the pay freeze. Federal employees
have already contributed $60 billion to deficit
reduction through the existing two-year pay
freeze. Based on a two percent calculation for
cost-of-living adjustments, the pay freeze
results in nearly a
$20,704.35 pay cut for a federal
worker earning an annual salary of $50,000 over
the next decade, and a $ 47,137.93 pay cut over
20 years.
This significant loss in pay is an
unjust burden on the nurses who care for our
veterans, law enforcement officers who patrol
our borders, civilian defense workers who
support our troops’ missions, and inspectors
who ensure the safety of our food and
medicines.
Second, we ask that you reject
the proposed increase in the pension
contribution. H.R. 3630 would require
federal workers to contribute an additional
1.5% of their salary to their retirement
without any corresponding increase in benefits.
Currently, a federal worker who makes $50,000
per year will receive a federal pension of just
$15,000 per year after 30 years of service.
Third, we ask that you reject the
elimination of the Federal Employee Retirement
System (FERS) minimum Social Security
supplement for workers not subject to mandatory
retirement. Many workers must retire
early for reasons outside their control, such
as illness or to care for a sick spouse or
parent.
These workers have counted on these
funds when planning their retirement and
eliminating it now would compromise their
retirement
security.
Finally, we ask that you reject a
proposal to establish a new retirement system
for federal employees hired beginning in 2013.
This new system would change the pension
calculation from the employees’ “high-3”
to a “high-5” salary and would increase the
current employee contribution from .08 percent
to 4 percent. It is estimated that these
changes would lower pension values by
approximately 30 percent despite a much higher
contribution on the part of those workers. Data
shows that current retirement benefits, such as
FERS, are one of the key ways that the federal
government recruits and retains the best and
brightest workers. These changes would
compromise that important
standard.
We ask that you reject these
provisions in H.R. 3630 that would freeze pay
and cut benefits for federal workers in the
House-Senate conference committee. Thank
you for your consideration of this
request.
Sincerely,
William R.
Dougan
Chairman
